It accuses a researcher for the so-called Steele dossier a since-discredited compendium of opposition research about purported links between Mr. Trump and Russia of lying to the F.B.I. meeting with Mr. Baker show that the bureau understood he had one by then. Cybersecurity expert Rob Graham told NBC News that what Joffe appeared to have been doing was a search for domain names and addresses to which a computer had tried to connect. Attorney General Merrick Garland is said to anticipate receiving his final report by the end of the year. Why don't you write about the others. You have some people who are great people now patriotic people. CNN Special counsel John Durham said Thursday he wasn't trying to inflame partisanship and media commentary with a recent cryptic filing that prompted former President Donald Trump and. Although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmanns February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Agency-2 with EOP data from after Mr. Trump took office, said the attorney, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President.. "), (Read "Officials Defend CIA's Use of Contractors. who posts videos online under the name Erik D. Kirk. Beginning Monday morning in Washington, special counsel John Durham the prosecutor who was appointed in 2019 by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia. I could still be wrong, maybe some Internet sleuth out there will find the video for me. White Students Forced to Pledge Allegiance to BLM, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | John Durham speaks to reporters on the steps of U.S. District Court in New Haven, Conn., on April 25, 2006. Then returned to Connecticut to join the State's Attorney's office. And kinda boring. Fridays court filing was made as part of an inquiry about whether the law firm Latham & Watkins had a conflict of interest in serving as counsel to Sussmann because it also represented other parties with interests in the case. Did the FBI end up finding out that Danchenko was not really a Russian asset? was aware that he had represented Democrats on matters related to Russias hacking of their servers, and subsequent communications made clear that he also had a client who had played a role in developing the data analysis concerning Alfa Bank, his lawyers say. Were still waiting for a report from a man named Durham who Ive never spoken to and never met. One person did some great detective work and determined that even the 4-5 photos look rigged: A couple of you both sent me this message, which is very weird: Up above you can see I posted a video by an actor (comedian?) Yet they kept him on board, kept paying him. And in fact, going to the F.B.I. Working with Rodney Joffe, a technology executive and cybersecurity expert, they theorized that it might be a covert communications channel. For perhaps everyone but Sussmann himself, the verdict at his trial may be beside the point. The FY 2022 budget estimate is $4,463,525 which, after Office of Management and Budget technical adjustments for the mandatory sequester, totals $4,209,104 in available operational funds. Notes of a March 2017 F.B.I. With a name like Whitey? Still, the judge has given prosecutors broader latitude to call witnesses associated with the Clinton campaign, including Mr. Elias and Robby Mook, the campaign manager. Foreign leaders do not have the right to unilaterally disclose U.S. classified information that has been shared with their country pursuant to a bilateral agreement. They deserve credit." The real question is, who invented him and why? There is no indication anything came of this, but upon being tipped off, the bureau did some digging and learned that Danchenko had been in contact with people it was investigating as possible Russian intelligence officers. We expect there to be testimony from the campaign that, while they were interested in an article on this coming out, going to the F.B.I. 600.8(a)(1). We've received your submission. Its safe again and were having a lot of fun over there. Heres How (and When) To Watch President Trump At CPAC! No, Im talking about why a man with such a storied and PUBLIC career does not have a single video existing of him anywhere online. When the bureau finally got around to questioning Danchenko because it hadnt been able to corroborate Steeles claims despite relying on them in court it learned that Steele appeared to have exaggerated and possibly fabricated rumors and innuendo about Trump that Danchenko was said to have passed along. White Students Forced to Pledge Allegiance to BLM, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This case represents the opposite of everything the Department of Justice is supposed to stand for. Heres How (and When) To Watch President Trump At CPAC! This may seem counterintuitive, since the judges decision to prevent him from airing his ambitious theory of a Clinton-orchestrated conspiracy should have diminished confidence in his work and in his various assertions. A message to you, Rudy (Read "The U.S. Prison for Iraq's Worst."). 2019 TIME USA, LLC. Terms & conditions/privacy policy apply. But he's supposed to be the smartest and the best, and he works for Bill Barr, who is a great attorney general. Legal experts said Sussmann could face additional legal exposure if he failed to disclose his relationship to Joffe. I hope that some day in the future we will reach this height of technological prowess. texas congressman louie gohmert says at a press conference with freedom caucus members calling . United States Attorney John H. Durham has kept such a low profile while handling some of the country's most infamous criminal investigations that he once made New Republic magazine's list of. Simply put, its this: have you ever actually seen a video of John Durham speaking? Most of his videos are parodies or comic sketches. Yet, far from alerting the FISC judges that there was significant reason to disbelieve the information from Steele about Trump who was by then the incumbent president the FBI continued to rely on that suspect information in sworn surveillance applications in April and June 2017, based on which the FISC granted additional spying warrants. Judicial Watch Sues Air Force Academy for Records about Critical Race Theor DOJ & FBI Target Biden Political Opponents, Judicial Watch Warns: Critical Race Theory Rising. Against that backdrop, much of the pretrial jostling has centered on how far afield prosecutors may roam from the core accusation. But rather than showing wrongdoing by the F.B.I., it is a case that portrays the bureau as a victim. Durhams team, however, has so far failed to persuade anyone to serve as this kind of witness. The disclosure about Joffe, who has not been charged, came in a filing in the court case of Michael Sussmann, a lawyer whom Durhams office indicted in September in connection with allegations of lying about his relationship with the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The photos from above show the man giving press conferences, so where is the video? A grand jury indicted Sussmann in September 2021, alleging that he lied to the FBI about not representing a client when he presented them with allegations about a secret Trump Organization back-channel to a Russian bank. The press-shy Connecticut prosecutor was tapped by Attorney General Eric Holder on Aug. 24 to investigate alleged mistreatment of terror suspects by CIA interrogators and contractors. I continue to find that extremely strange! John Durham is a low-profile professional thrust into a decidedly high-profile assignment. The defendant is Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who worked at the outside law firm representing the Clinton campaign, and he is facing a single count of lying to the FBIs top lawyer in the run-up to the election in order to instigate a criminal investigation into Trump. Watch it till the end before you send it to me.its from a Saturday Night Live skit: Well, some of you have sent me some really interesting ideas! Under the circumstances, Durham has, in a perverse sense, already won that second trial of a non-crime that he wont be presenting this week. Yes, I know he is the man who allegedly took down Whitey Bulger. And second, it was to get law enforcement to investigate it; and perhaps third, your honor, to get the press to report on the fact that law enforcement was investigating it.. A deep dive into Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation and the costs entailed. The attorneys also said that Sussmann never billed the Clinton campaign for the February meeting with the CIA, nor could he have because the campaign had effectively ceased to exist. Douglass Mackey Allegedly Aimed to Depress Black Turnout in Pennsylvania, Release the Kraken: Fox News Revolving Sidney Powell Conspiracy Theory Door. Allegedly, he was on the team of prosecutors for the Whitey Bulger case, yet, you will not find his name mentioned anywhere from 2013 when the case was prosecuted. At the time of the indictment,Sussmannsattorneys issued a statement that said: MichaelSussmannwas indicted today because of politics, not facts. Led a task force to go after Hartford street gangs in 1992. Some details of that matter remain murky. Updated 10/18/2022 07:43 PM EDT. AP Photo/Jon Elswick, The trial beginning this week was supposed to be the culmination of an otherwise spotty and languorous investigation, now entering its fourth year. Just abysmal. SICK: Here Is That Perverted Sex Ed Video Teaching First Graders To Masturbate, Pfizer Makes Stunning Admission On COVID-19 Jab Clinical Trials. (His report detailed numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, but he did not charge any Trump associate with a criminal conspiracy with Russia. "I'm not at CPAC. The result is particularly ironic since many of these same people vocally criticized the coverage of the Mueller investigation on the theory that the media was cherry-picking information and credulously accepting the claims of prosecutors and sympathetic pundits, but they have adopted the same methodology that they once railed against a combination of pseudo-forensic readings of court filings and public documents, politically provocative narratives constructed from largely contextless scraps of information, and a strong, seemingly indestructible confirmation bias against their political adversaries. Durham loses again in court, but trial airs FBI flaws, Jury gets Danchenko case in what may be Durham's swan song, Judge dismisses 1 of 5 counts against Trump dossier source, Durham presents new evidence on day 2 of Danchenko trial, Sussmann acquitted on charge brought by special counsel Durham, Jury sees conflicting evidence on Michael Sussmann's role at FBI Trump-Russia meeting, Jurors hear contrasting stories about FBI handling of Trump-Russia secret server claims, Clinton 2016 campaign manager denies approving passing anti-Trump info to FBI. (Despite much hype, Durhams prosecutors were eventually forced to concede that there was no indication that the lawyers misrepresentation actually affected the investigation, while the sentencing judge said that the lawyer was simply saving himself some work rather than trying to mislead the presiding surveillance court.). would have still investigated the allegations. No, I'm talking about why a man with such a storied and PUBLIC career does not have a single video existing . Boston lawyer Anthony Cardinale, who has faced Durham in the courtroom. Go do your own research, spend 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes trying to find a video of this man and then come back and vote in my poll.. Now I want to talk about something else. Monday, December 9, 2019 Statement of U.S. Attorney John H. Durham "I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. . looked into the matter, which involved a server for the Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank, and decided it was unsubstantiated. And that the Garland DOJ is still hiding documents adds to the scandal.. I actually think it would have been a lot funnier if he actually made it a funny satire piece, but as is its just kind of hard to understand what he was going for. No charge. A lawyer for Mr. Lichtblau has asked the judge to limit questioning to his discussions with Mr. Sussmann, avoiding other confidential sources and journalistic matters. The supplemental response includes an unredacted June 30, 2021, memo from Assistant Attorney General Lee Lofthus to Attorney General Garland with the subject line Fiscal Year 2022 Special Counsels Office Budget Request, showing a previously withheld estimated budget of $8,627,629. Ive been covering a REALLY weird story about John Durham recently. (VIDEO) Donald Trump Pitches Agenda 47: Create Freedom Cities. SICK: Here Is That Perverted Sex Ed Video Teaching First Graders To Masturbate, Pfizer Makes Stunning Admission On COVID-19 Jab Clinical Trials. West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament. Responding to a reporter's inquiry about the Boston mafia probe. As youre looking for videos, dont both sending me this one below. Something potentially much more interesting. I cant tell if its satire/parody or what. The document production comes in the March 2022 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch after the DOJ failed to respond to an August 2021, request for records of communication between Special Counsel John Durham and Attorney General Merrick Garland, and all budget records related to the operations of the office of Special Counsel (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice(No. Durhams investigation suffered a significant setback in the spring when a Washington, DC, jury acquitted Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann. The judges rulings were thoughtful and well-reasoned, which managed to obscure just how unusual it is for prosecutors to be so thoroughly constrained from presenting the case that they want. But he suggested that the defense would contend that Mr. Sussmann did not believe he was taking the matter to the F.B.I. Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Three days ago, I asked my Telegram Channel to see if anyone in there could find a video actually showing John Durham moving, talkingbeing a real person. You been drinking brew for breakfast And yet, despite all those photos, I cant find a single video of the man actually speaking. Durham, 59, is no stranger to top-level governmental investigations. In setting up the meeting, Mr. Sussmann had told an F.B.I. Durham released an official announcement saying he would resign effective at midnight Sunday. But news reports indicate that editors were not ready to run that article, which was being written by the reporter Eric Lichtblau, although the paper published one mentioning Alfa Bank six weeks later. Both companies denied a connection, and the FBI eventually closed the investigation. Glad to see you again. Unusual public remarks at press conference the day former FBI agent John Connolly was convicted in 2002. John Durham speaks to reporters on the steps of U.S. District Court in New Haven, Connecticut. If you love what we do, please consider a $1/month donation to keep us live! Prosecutors have alleged that Sussmann lied to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker at a meeting between the two men on Sept. 19, 2016 during which Sussmann provided several white papers and data to Baker concerning a possible link between computers in Trump Tower and Russias Alfa Bank by stating falsely that he was not acting on behalf of any client when, in fact, he was supposedly doing so on behalf of both the Clinton campaign and a technology industry executive named Rodney Joffe who hoped to obtain a position in the Clinton administration.
St Augustine Basketball Roster, Cpni Requirements Dictate That Gts, Beko Integrated Dishwasher Door Fitting Instructions, Oan Viewership Ratings 2021, Wildewood California, Md Hoa, Articles J